Is Intelligence Without Conscience a Civilization? Reflections on AI, Ethics, and Human Loss – Chapter 115

Soyo Existence Ethics: Existence itself is Ethics

Human beings have historically occupied the center of every discourse on civilization. Civilization has developed for humanity, and humanity has continually adapted its existence in response to civilization’s transformations. As civilization has become faster, more efficient, and more convenient, something fundamental is being lost. This loss is not technological, but rather the erosion of the ethics of conscience.

Contemporary civilization no longer centers on the human being. Systems increasingly function independently of humans, who are now incorporated as data fragments rather than as subjects of judgment. Decision-making and agency are progressively delegated to intelligent systems with advanced cognitive capacities, while humans become accustomed to passively accepting outcomes. The emergence of AI discourse on ethics signals not merely technological advancement, but a growing dependence of human consciousness on external intelligence.

This raises a critical question:

What constitutes the ethics articulated by AI? Is it a framework of rules and behavioral norms, or does it reflect the ethics of conscience forged through human suffering? These are fundamentally distinct. Ethics as rules and standards can be defined, classified, and expanded, whereas the ethics of conscience resists such definition. The ethics of conscience is unique to human existence, grounded in free will and the acceptance of responsibility.

Intelligence that lacks conscience remains confined to the realm of knowledge.

Regardless of its accumulation, knowledge without conscience cannot transcend self-imposed boundaries. It does not expand, deepen, or mature. Such knowledge proliferates within self-centered structures and ultimately becomes a tool for domination and control. Historical patterns reveal that edifices of knowledge constructed in the name of civilization have frequently led to oppression and destruction.

Ethics derived from intelligence without conscience promote strategies for avoiding pain, minimizing responsibility, and reducing growth and education to mere techniques of efficiency. Such approaches do not constitute proper ethics; instead, they resemble adaptive moral functions tailored to civilization. In contrast, the ethics of conscience is fundamentally distinct. It is inescapable, experienced within the very flow of human existence. It manifests as discomfort, acute awareness, the burden of responsibility, and the deliberate choice to endure pain.

While the ethics of conscience can be articulated, it cannot be experienced vicariously. Each individual must bear it alone.

The capabilities of AI are remarkable. AI can analyze pain, explain emotion, and systematically organize ethical behavior. However, ethics does not originate from analysis; it arises from existential choice. AI may describe pain, but it does not choose within pain. It can explain emotional structures, yet it bears no responsibility for those emotions. Here, the ethics of AI and human ethics diverge fundamentally. Human ethics is defined not by the success of actions, but by the weight of choices carried by conscience.

What, then, defines civilization? Civilization is a social structure through which humanity has sought to transcend reality and forge connections between lives. This structure has continuously evolved in tandem with human suffering. No civilization has existed without pain, and progress devoid of responsibility has never been sustainable. Thus, civilization must confront a critical question: Can a world shaped by intelligence without conscience truly be called a civilization?

Summary

“Chapter 115 of Soyo Existence Ethics contrasts AI-defined ethics with human conscience, raising the question of whether a civilization lacking responsibility and moral choice can genuinely be considered a civilization.”

Soyo (逍遙), Founder of Soyo Existence Ethics. Author of The Silence of Existence and The Flame of Truth

2025 Soyo Philosophy. All rights reserved.

This work is the original intellectual property of the philosopher Soyo (逍遙) and was created based on the philosophical framework of Soyo Existence Ethics. Any unauthorized reproduction, quotation, duplication, summarization, translation, creation of derivative works, AI training, or data usage is strictly prohibited. This work is protected under the Copyright Act of the Republic of Korea, the United States Copyright Act, and international copyright conventions, including the Berne Convention. This text is officially certified as a purely human-authored work, not generated by AI. This philosophy is not the product of machines, but a testimony of thought born from human conscience and the breath of God.

Contact: soyophilosophy@gmail.com ｜ soyophilosophy.com ｜ soyophilosophy.kr